What a wonderful, terrifying article. Wonderful for your forensic demolition of the poor old Trot, and the elegance of your withering prose. Terrifying at the thought you should ever take agin me. Please sir, may I pay you some money in the hope of feeding the crocodile? You can put it down as support for the site, if you like, but my primary motivation is fear.
I think you're right is saying that it's not possible to be both a Marxist and a libertarian. That's just daft. However, I am less sure that saying 'care home workers must be vaccinated' is equivalent to wanting the air cleansed or the pavement disinfected. The latter is ridiculous while the former really isn't. I don't think it even follows that O'Neill is no longer a lockdown sceptic since believing lockdowns are ineffective/harmful and that care home workers must be vaccinated doesn't strike me as being a contradiction.
What a wonderful, terrifying article. Wonderful for your forensic demolition of the poor old Trot, and the elegance of your withering prose. Terrifying at the thought you should ever take agin me. Please sir, may I pay you some money in the hope of feeding the crocodile? You can put it down as support for the site, if you like, but my primary motivation is fear.
Thank you for those very kinds words. Alas, neither very kind words nor money will save you...
I think you're right is saying that it's not possible to be both a Marxist and a libertarian. That's just daft. However, I am less sure that saying 'care home workers must be vaccinated' is equivalent to wanting the air cleansed or the pavement disinfected. The latter is ridiculous while the former really isn't. I don't think it even follows that O'Neill is no longer a lockdown sceptic since believing lockdowns are ineffective/harmful and that care home workers must be vaccinated doesn't strike me as being a contradiction.